|
From Paul Geffen's message to Sviatoslav Richter list members:
I hope that readers on the Richter list will forgive me for
including two discs here that contain nothing by Richter. That
said, I believe that those who are not already familiar with
the art of Maria Yudina and Grigori Ginsburg will see that they
also possess exceptional interpretive gifts. The composer best
represented above is the one closest to the heart of every Russian
pianist: Johann Sebastian Bach. The performances of the English
Suites recorded here are similar to the others given by Richter
in the same year and already available on the Stradivarius and
Live Classics labels. In this recital in Moscow he plays more
freely and in with more lively spirit. The sound is first rate
and possibly digital. Richter left few recorded interpretations
of the Debussy Images and the others are all from 1960 or earlier.
This live performance from 1983 shows great depth of feeling.
I cannot compare it to the Book I in the Carnegie Hall version,
which I have not heard, but the "Cloches" on this set
is slower and gentler than either of the two interpretations
from 1954 and 1958 on Parnassus. Two Chopin etudes complete the
second disc. They are undated but from the tempi and sound they
seem to be early recordings, possibly from the 1950s. They are
faster and more aggressive than the later versions, but very
beautifully played. There is no sign of an audience here so it
may be that these are from the studio. The Prokofiev Sonata that
opens the third disc has very clear sound and an amazingly precise
performance. The Scriabin Sonata that follows is brusque and
lyrical by turns, as the composer requires. The rest of this
program consists of the Ravel Valses nobles et sentimentales,
and Miroirs. These pieces are given rough-edged, granitic, almost
cubist interpretations thus proving that French music need not
be pretty. Sound from this 1964 Moscow Conservatory recital is
excellent, but there are some signs of an audience. The Liszt
Sonata from 1965 in volume 5 shows the performer in a more determined
and more impulsive mood than we hear in the recorded recitals
from around the same time in Europe. Here the Moscow environment
brings out the best in Richter, as was the case in Carnegie Hall.
Of course this also brings with it a few slips, which is to be
expected as the pianist risks everything to bring entirely new
timbres from his instrument. The Yudina and Ginsburg discs each
begin with a piece by Bach, naturally, but the highlight and
revelation of these selections must be the Mussorgsky pieces.
Yudina takes these simple short works and finds emotional depths
that rival the great interpretations of songs by this composer.
Ginsburg is well represented here with both solo and concerto
works. I will leave a full description of these items for another
day and only say that Richter has excellent company. The production
values for this series are modest but everything is nicely done.
There are no liner notes but all discs have complete track listings
with timings and the layout and production of the printed material
is attractive. This presentation of historical recordings is
in many ways as good as most commercial releases, and it is better
than many.
Farhan Malik wrote to Sviatoslav Richter list memebers:
I would like to follow up Paul's comments on the Russian Masters
CDs with some of my own. He has covered the Richter volumes in
detail so I am focusing on the others. I am most impressed by
the Russian Masters discs. The performances are excellent and
in remarkably good sound. All Richter fans will want to own the
Richter volumes, but it would be a mistake to pass up the Ginzburg
and Yudina volumes. Ginzburg was one of the century's greatest
pianists, and his playing of the Arensky and Kabalevsky Concertos
is absolutely first rate making one wonder why both he and those
works are not better known. The solo works on volume 5, particularly
the Chopin and Liszt, are masterfully played, full of poetry
and virtuosity. Those unfamiliar with Ginzburg's playing are
in for a revelation. The Yudina volume is also highly recommended.
Many of her best features are captured while her renowned eccentricities
are kept in check; the Bach/Liszt Prelude and Fugue in A minor
receives a commanding performance. It is a great thrill to have
previously unreleased recordings by these pianists available,
and in the case of Ginzburg and Yudina much repertoire new to
their discographies.
Farhan
Paul M. N. Forsell wrote:
Speaking of the Bach/Galston Siciliano as played by Ginzburg,
I must say that I don't think I've ever heard piano playing that
is so beautiful. It is a truly great performance and I was very
moved to hear it. It is a perfect performance: listen to the
tone, the phrasing, the voicing, how he brings out the theme
in the soprano! The more I hear Ginzburg the more I value him.
He was one of the five greatest Soviet era pianists, along with
VS, SF, SR, KI, and EG. Indeed, he was one of the greatest pianists
of this century!
Mark Mao [about Richter playing English suites]:
The sound is very good! it's out of my expecting. Here are
what I found in these recording, purely technical point of view,
for your ref: 1) It seems that microphones were a little far
away from piano compare with regular studio recording. 2) Sound
is pretty warm with echo from the big music hall. Mic(omni-direction?)
can not catch low frequency very well, I can hear a little be
loose low frequency. 3) It's an analog recording, we can hear
high frequency noise "hiss........" from the open reel
tape recorder. From another point of view is good, which means
you did not added artificial post-process to reduce it or let's
say pollute it. 4) I prefer to have a longer applause (it's a
personal taste), it's a live recording anyway!
From: Ramon Khalona
To: Paul Geffen
Subject: Richter CDs
With kind permission of Mr. Paul Geffen
and Mr. Ramon Khalona
Dear Paul,
As a way of feedback, I'd like to say that I really like the
Bach (one of my initial motivations in getting the CDs in the
first place) and the Debussy. The rest of the recordings will
probably take longer to win me over, but in Richter's case I'm
always happy to give him the benefit of the doubt. I realize
that these recordings are valuable and are generally in good
sound given the sources and conditions in which they were recorded.
Honestly, I must tell you that for the price of these CDs, even
some minimal documentation would have been nice. As a point of
comparison, Parnassus Records' production of "Richter in
the 50s" (which are comparable in sound quality and provenance)
would be more attractive to the general - and even expert - collector
in the sense that some documentation (even as minimal as that
is) is offered and the discs are more attractively priced. I
realize that price may also be impacted by volume, but since
this is a two-way street, perhaps better documentation would
improve things in a second batch production of what you're offering.
In summary, a Richter collector (though not a completist one)
like me finds these valuable, and I'm happy to obtain them. I
hope my comments will be taken in the helpful vein they're meant.
Antonio J. Aznar wrote:
[snip] ...I don't care about liner notes: most of us know
Richter's art or biography or ever repeating comments by heart.
[snip] ....As for the sound and transfers, I actually expected
a somehow "dated" or "darker" sound, but
when I spinned the Bach suites, it turned out to sound a lot
better than the equivalent Stradivari or Philips discs ! Believe
me: they don't need any "better" remaster: they sound
clean from digital artifacts already (I have valved amplification
and a very revealing transport/DAC, and the sound of the piano
is absolutely gorgeous: natural, timbrically correct, well placed
within space, lots of air around the instrument, uncompressed
sound..., you name it) The performances, as expected, are worlds
apart. I am of the opinion that Richter always -always- played
better in hometown Moscow than anywhere else. Perhaps with the
possible exception of some recitals in London (hear the BBC recent
RFH reissue with Schubert sonatas: agile, humble, with a chamberlike
approach that make them another jewel). The small Prokofiev #2
"flaw" is not really bothersome (at least for me):
just as if an unexpected cough had interferred: the ear soon
adjusts for. There's a similar flaw in his Hindemith's Ludus
Tonalis from Tours '85. As for the Haydn cut-n-paste is unnoticeable.
The other discs are wonderful also: the Chopin is incomparable:
forget about the other performances: relaxed and flowing; the
Images I (which I hadn't heard before, as I don't own any of
the American CBS', Columbias, Sonys...etc) are superlative, as
was always with Richter's Debussy: nuanced and well integrated.
The Scriabin and Liszt sonatas are masterfully played, and the
Ravel idiomatic as ever. I find the Liszt sonata superior to
the other existing recordings: hearing the piece in concert must
have been an experience...
 |